Today in the moot court my group and I debated the Bakke v
Regents of the University of California that took place in the year 1978. In
the Bakke v Regents of the University of California, 35 year old Allan Bakke
sued University of California at Davis Medical School for having a minority
program that reserved 16 out of 100 spots for minorities. Bakke had applied to 12 Medical schools and
had been denied from all them even though he had significantly higher MCAT scores
than the minorities in the minority program and had a 3.5 grade point
average. After being denied a second
time from the University of California at Davis Medical School, Bakke decided
to go to court and sue the school for violating Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection clause.
During the moot court the legal team representing Bakke used
these documents to justify that the minority program’s use of quotas was
unconstitutional. They also argued that Bakke had a higher GPA and significantly
higher MCAT scores than the minorities. My team argued that the majority of
students in the program were white and in this period of time there was a need
for minority doctors since 2.1 percent of the U.S.’s population had black
doctors at the time. We also argued that the program was established for
disadvantage minorities. We stated how Bakke was indeed not disadvantaged since
he had a stable job and a home of his own. After debating for 20 minutes, the
judge ruled in Bakke’s favor for having more valid documents and making better
arguments.
No comments:
Post a Comment