Monday, April 27, 2015

Plessy v. Ferguson Moot Court

On Wednesday, March 4, 2015, the famous Plessy v Ferguson case was debated as a moot court in Professor Smith’s FYS class. In this case, Homer Plessy, who was of mixed race, sued the state of Louisiana for forcing him to move to an all black trailer on Louisiana train even though he bought a ticket that would have allowed him to sit in the all white section in the nicer part of the train.  The court case’s actual date took place in the year 1896 and it was the first time that the Separate Car Act and the doctrine of  “separate but equal “ was debated in front of the supreme court.





The moot court began with Team Reagan arguing that Plessy had the right and the privilege to purchase a ticket to the white part of the train regardless of his race. Team Reagan stated that Plessy was set up by the Louisiana railroad company and was arrested by an undercover detective on the train even though Plessy did not cause any trouble. The litigation team also pointed out that although the apartments on the train were separate, they were not equal. The white sections on the train were significantly nicer than the black sections. Team Reagan concluded  by saying that  the state of Louisiana had no constitutional authority over the railroad system since the railroad expanded through several state lines. Team Red, White, and Better thought otherwise. Their legal team argued that segregation of public transportation and accommodations are indeed constitutional and that since the railroad company was private,  they had the right to make their own rules. They also argued that the separate cable cars were implemented for protection of both the black and white passengers. They believed that if black and whites had their own cable cars, it would prevent racial hatred towards the races and potential brawls.



The moot court resulted in the   Red, White, and Better Team winning, since they had stronger arguments, and stronger legal documents to support their arguments.

Monday, April 20, 2015

Michael Slager Charged With Murder of Walter Scott in South Carolina

On April 4, 2015, African American, Walter Scott was fatally shot in Charleston, South Carolina by Charleston Police officer Michael Slager .The 33 year old policeman was arrested and charged with murder shortly after a video from a cell phone was released showing the officer shooting the unarmed Scott a total of eight times when he was running away from Slager. South Carolina officials reported that if Slager is convicted, he could face 30 years in prison or the death penalty.



The incident took place on a Saturday at 9:30 am when Slager pulled Scott over for having a broken taillight. Slager wrote in his police report that Scott tried to reach for his Taser, however the video that was taken by a bystander shows Scott being shot eight times running in the opposite direction of the police officer in an empty parking lot. In the video, Scott is shown falling to the ground after Slager fires his last shot from his gun and Slager slowly walks towards Scott and put handcuffs on him. By the time the police tried to give Scott CPR, he was announced dead. The video did not show any footage of Scott grabbing for Slager’s Taser.

Walter Scott

L. Chris Stewart, who is the attorney for the Scott Family, told reporters that Scott probably try to run from the police because he had not made his child support payments on time. Failure to pay child support on time, results in jail time in the state of South Carolina until all payments are made. Although Scott should have not run from the police, Slager had no right or justification for shooting Scott. North Charleston Mayor, Keith Summey, said that Slager was charged for murder based on the footage from the video. Mayor Summey also said in his announcement of the incident, “not something that we like to hear or liker to say but it goes to say how we work as a community: When you’re wrong, you’re wrong and if you make a bad decision, don’t care if you are behind the shield or just acitizen across the street, you have to live by that decision".  

I strongly agree with what Mayor Summey said. It does not matter who you are, whether you are a normal citizen or a police officer. When you break the law, you will face the consequences.I am glad that justice is being served for the Scott family and that another cop is not getting away with murdering another innocent citizen. It is too bad that no one had video footage for the Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown cases.

Monday, April 6, 2015

Officials: Evidence doesn't support foul play in Mississippi hanging

On the Friday of March 20, 54 year old African American, Otis Byrd, was found hanging from a tree in Port Gibson, Mississippi. Officials said that he was found in the deep  woods behind his house with bed sheets around his neck, hanging from a branch 15 feet off the ground. The main question that officials are trying to figure out is whether Byrd committed suicide or whether he was actually lynched, since Mississippi has a history of lynching African Americans and a reputation of being one of the most racist states in the country. According to Claiborne county officials, the evidence reported so far does not indicate that any malicious actions occurred, so officials are leaning more toward the possibility of suicide, however that will be also hard to prove considering that there was no chair to be found in the crime scene.



Family members told authorities that they did not recall seeing any signs of suspicion of Byrd’s everyday life. His family and friends told authorities that they did not know of any enemies that would murder Byrd. In 1980, Byrd was convicted of murdering a woman but was paroled in 1996, so authorities also consider the possibility that someone could have murdered Byrd as revenge. Crime scene investigator and president of the Crime Scene Forensics LLC, Thomas Martin, said that injuries to a dead person is usually an indication of lynching or finger prints from the rope usually show that the victim was struggling to escape from the rope.


The FBI is also looking into the case and is using their team of forensic experts to investigate the crime scent to make sure that the crime was not a lynching. I believe that this case was definitely a lynching considering that thousands of African Americans have been lynched the Mississippi in the past and lynching continues to occur today.  Also I find it really hard to believe that a man could hang himself 15 feet off the ground without out any truck or car being present in the crime scene.


Tuesday, February 24, 2015

3 students shot to death in apartment near UNC Chapel Hill

On Tuesday February 12, 2015, three  Muslim college students were shot to death in an apartment near the  University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.  The victims of this crime were sisters, Yusor  – Salha, 21, and Razan Abu –Salha,19, and Yusor’s husband, Abu Salha, 23. Police believe that the shooting of the three college students was over a parking spot, however they would not be surprised if it was a hate crime since all three of the students were Muslim. The man who was charged for murder for killing them  was 46 year old Craig Stephen Hicks. Facebook users come to the conclusion that Hicks, who is an atheist, killed the students because they were Muslim. Users have noticed comments posted on Facebook that could possibly be interpreted as racist comments.


Hick’s wife, Karen, thinks otherwise. She believes that her husband did  not shoot the students because of their religion but for parking in his parking spot on a regular basis. His wife also mentioned to authorities that she’s in the process of getting a divorce so that could be a possible factor for her husband’s actions. Karen’s attorney, Rob Maitland, stressed in an interview the importance of looking into people’s health records because it was clear that Craig ‘s mental health was not in the normal range, considering he shot 3 people over a parking spot.



The father of Yusor Abu  Salha and  Razan Abu Salha, Mohammad Abu Salha disagrees with Karen’s claims. He told CNN that he is very certain that  the deaths of his daughters and son in law were  because of their religion. He told CNN that problems did not begin to escalate until his oldest daughter moved in with his son in law in his condo. He told reporters that his eldest daughter, Yusor, had told him that Hicks  always came to their door to argue about an issue with a gun on his belt. The father believes that once Hicks saw his daughter with a head scarf, he figured she was Muslim, which he appeared to not be fond of. Stories like this show that racism can occur in any race, but it is important that we stand up for people when we see them being discriminated against. America cannot watch children killed over this issue no longer.



Sunday, February 15, 2015

State v. Mann Court Case

The first moot trial of the year was great to see. Both teams did a great job making arguments and supporting them referring to state laws and the constitution. Mr. Mann’s team of lawyers stated as an argument that slaves have no constitutional rights and that the law gives absolute power to the owner over the slave. Since John Mann rented out the slave, Lydia, from his neighbor, Elizabeth Jones, under contract, all owner ship was transferred to Mr. Mann under law.  Mr. Mann’s teams of lawyers justified him shooting and wounding Lydia by referring to state law. This state law states that if a runaway slave is caught, they must be returned to the owner and if the sheriff catches a runaway slave, the sheriff has the authority and right to kill the slave under the law.  In this situation, since Mr. Mann had absolute power over Lydia and since Lydia was considered property, him shooting was legal and justifiable.

On the other side, the state’s team of lawyers made a good argument stating that it was unmoral that the slave, Lydia, is treated like property even though she is human like any other race in the world. The state believed that Mr. Mann mistreated his “property” and that he had no right to shoot Lydia.  Although the state made a great argument, it was their opinion vs. laws and facts mentioned by Mr. Mann’s team of lawyers. The state in reality really had no chance against Mr. Mann.  I learned from this case that in this period of time the laws were not fair and were unmoral. I also learned that in this period of time, the law stated that it was ok to treat other human beings like “property” based solely on the color of their skin.  It’s important for citizens of the U.S. of today to learn about this case to prevent anything like this from ever happening again



Wednesday, February 11, 2015

ISIS: Japanese hostage beheaded

On Tuesday February 3, 2015, CNN reported that Japanese journalist, Kenji Goto,  was killed by ISIS member, Jihadi John, in a 67 second long video. In the video the masked ISIS member, Jihadi John gives a brief speech in English to the people of Japan standing behind Goto with a knife in his hand.  According to CNN the video goes black as Jihadi John puts his knife to Goto’s throat. Once the video is clear again, Goto head is seen on the ground due to decapitation. This is not the first time that the masked man, Jihadi John, has hurled threats and overseen beheadings of other innocent citizens. He has been reported to have been present in six videos with hostages. Reporters describe his voice similar to a London accent. Goto was the second Japanese citizen to be killed by ISIS. The 47 year old father left behind a wife and a daughter who was recently born in December. 

ISIS continues to take hostages from different countries to prove their power and dominance. Just recently ISIS captured Jordanian pilot, Moath al Kasasbeh in Syria. He was captured after ejecting from his F-16 Jet.  ISIS has reported to Jordanian officials that they demand Jordan to exchange a convicted terrorist named Sajida al-Rishawi, for al-Kasasbeh. ISIS claims that if the swap does not take place, al Kassabeh will be killed. Jordanian Officials say that they are willing to give al -Rishawi  to ISIS in exchange for the pilot. Al –Rishawi is a female jihadist who was imprisoned in Jordan for being part of 2005 suicide bombing at a wedding reception, which killed dozens of innocent people. Jordan’s main  objective now is to receive some type of verification that al –Kaseasbeh is still alive.

At this point I believe that the United States should get involved in this affair and ally with Jordan to stop ISIS before they murder more innocent people.




Sunday, January 25, 2015

U.S. Officials say 6,000 ISIS fighters killed in battles



On Thursday January 22, U.S. diplomatic officials reported that the coalition  fighting ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) has killed  an estimate of 6,000  fighters, which included half of the top commanders in the group. The U.S. Central of Command provided the estimate of fighter casualties and has confirmed that ISIS fighters have been killed in Iraq and Syria by U.S. coalition airstrikes. The Central of Command continues to keep track of fighters killed, however it has not been made public. U.S. intelligence estimates that ISIS has a fighting force between 9,000-18,000 fighters. However it is said that the terror group can attract many supporters willing to fight, therefore  ISIS could amass up to 31,000 followers. Rear Admiral John Kirby told reporters that the U.S. is not keeping a “body count” because it would be wrong to report such a substantial number to the public. Kirby refers to use the word “tally” rather than the word “body count”, because “body count” to him refers to the Vietnam War statistics. In the Vietnam War the Pentagon reported “body counts” as a measure of its triumph against the Viet Cong. Kirby explained to reporters that when he used the term “tally”, it was not used to show its success against ISIS. The only action that the U.S. has taken against ISIS has been launching airstrikes in the location of their territory. In Iraq the number of airstrikes has increased in Mosul. 

The goal for the U.S. is to completely cut off ISIS’s supply line. Now that the U.S. has killed a significant number of ISIS fighters, the country could possibly face war and retaliation in the future. I believe that the U.S. should develop  a plan to foil retaliatory acts. The U.S. should strengthen its defense systems, so we will be able to  counter attack retaliatory acts by ISIS.